Micromachining proficiency CNC precision technology
Micro features are cut by the same physics as any other part, just with far less room for error. This page explains what changes below Ø1 mm: spindle speed, tool runout, chip load, heat and metrology. Written for engineers and buyers who need to judge whether a micro feature is machinable, and where it stops being economical.

In this article
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
What actually changes at micro scale
Below roughly Ø1 mm of cutter diameter, the cutting edge radius becomes a large fraction of the chip thickness. A 0.3 mm end mill may have an edge radius near 1–2 μm. When chip load per tooth drops under that radius, the tool does not slice cleanly. It rubs, then bites. That is why a micro cut can look fine on one pass and smear on the next with no change to the program.
The second shift is stiffness. Tool deflection scales with the cube of the length-to-diameter ratio. A 0.5 mm tool hanging 10 mm out is already at 20:1. Push it to 25:1 and the side load from a normal chipload bends it more than the feature tolerance allows. The machine holds ±0.005 mm, but the tool is the weak link, not the servo.
The third shift is thermal. Micro tools have almost no mass to carry heat away, so the spindle speed that works for a Ø6 mm cutter will burn the edge off a Ø0.5 mm one. Surface speed still governs tool life, but at small diameters the same surface speed means very high rpm, which drives runout and spindle growth.
None of this is exotic. It is the ordinary mechanics of cutting, compressed into a smaller window. The engineering job is to know which of the three limits is active on a given feature, because the fix is different for each one.
Spindle speed, runout and the real ceiling
Spindle runout sets the floor on achievable micro accuracy. If the tool holder runs out 5 μm at the tool tip, the effective chip load varies tooth to tooth by that amount. On a target chip load of 3 μm per tooth, one edge cuts nothing and the next cuts double. The result is rapid flank wear on one flute and a poor floor finish.
Measure runout at the tool, not at the holder taper. A tenth indicator on the flute land, rotated by hand, tells the truth. Getting below 3 μm usually means a shrink-fit or hydraulic holder, a clean taper, and a dedicated micro collet. We keep separate holders for micro work rather than swapping them through general milling jobs.
Speed helps, but only up to the point where the tool shank starts to whirl. For aluminium, a Ø0.5 mm two-flute carbide cutter might run at 20,000–30,000 rpm with a light chip load. Running faster is not automatically better. If the chip cannot clear, recutting raises the temperature faster than the extra speed removes material.
On our 16 simultaneous 5-axis machining centers we hold ±0.005 mm on micro features. That number is a floor for position, not a promise that any geometry will hit it. Wall thickness, aspect ratio and material all move the real limit.
Tool geometry and chip load selection
Micro end mills come in two useful families: sharp two-flute tools for aluminium and plastics, and stronger three-flute or four-flute tools for steel and titanium. More flutes mean a stiffer core, but less chip room. In a slot 0.6 mm wide and 3 mm deep, chip evacuation decides the outcome more than flute count does.
A workable starting chip load for micro milling in aluminium is 1–3 μm per tooth. In 316L stainless, drop to 0.5–1.5 μm. These are starting points for a sharp new tool. As the edge wears, the same feed starts to rub, and the noise changes before the dimension does. Operators who listen catch this early.
Coating matters less at micro scale than edge sharpness. A thick AlTiN layer can round a 1 μm edge and turn a cutting tool into a burnishing tool. For aluminium, uncoated or a thin DLC works better. For hardened steel and titanium, a thin PVD coating does extend life, provided the edge radius stays small.
Corner radius is the other lever. A sharp internal corner in a micro pocket is a stress riser for the tool and a hard feature to measure. Adding a 0.1 mm corner radius often removes the need for a separate EDM step and cuts cycle time.
Cooling, chip evacuation and thermal drift
A micro cavity holds very little coolant, and a fine mist often works better than a flood. High-pressure through-tool coolant is ideal when the tool has internal channels, but most micro tools do not. Air blast plus a small amount of oil mist keeps the chip moving without loading the tool.
Recutting is the most common cause of sudden tool failure in micro milling. The chip is roughly the same size as the flute space. If it stays in the pocket, the next tooth hits it again, and the edge chips. Peck cycles and short passes help, even though they add cycle time.
Thermal drift is easy to miss. A spindle running at 25,000 rpm warms its bearings and grows along the axis. Over a 20-minute cut, that can move Z by several micrometres. For tight work we warm up the spindle, cut the critical feature early, or probe between operations rather than relying on a cold setting.
In-process probing is the practical answer for micro features with ±0.005 mm tolerance. Touching off between roughing and finishing catches drift before it becomes scrap. It costs cycle time. It costs less than a rejected batch.
Which materials behave, and which fight back
Aluminium 6061 and 7075 are the friendliest micro materials. They cut cleanly, throw chips well and hold a sharp edge. 7075 gives better stiffness for thin walls. Plastics such as POM, PEEK and ABS cut easily but move with temperature, so light finishing passes and sharp uncoated tools matter more than speed.
Brass C36000 and copper C110 machine well at micro scale, though copper tends to smear and needs a sharp, polished edge. Beryllium copper cuts cleanly but requires dust control and a proper NDA-backed process, which we run routinely.
Stainless 303 and 304 are workable. 316L and 17-4PH work-harden quickly, so the tool must keep moving. Any dwell, any rubbing, and the surface hardens under the edge. Once that happens the next pass is cutting hardened steel, not soft stainless.
Titanium TC4 and Inconel are the hard cases. Heat stays at the edge, and tool life is short. Micro features in these alloys are possible, but expect more tool changes and a higher cost per part. Magnesium AZ31B cuts fast but needs chip handling rules for fire safety.
How we set up a micro job, step by step
A typical sequence for a first-article micro part.
- 1Review the drawing for micro featuresList every dimension under Ø1 mm, every wall under 0.5 mm and every internal corner radius. Flag features that need EDM instead of milling.
- 2Pick the tool and holderChoose the largest tool that fits the feature. Use a shrink-fit or hydraulic holder. Measure runout at the flute, target under 3 μm.
- 3Set the chip load and speedStart at 1–3 μm per tooth in aluminium, 0.5–1.5 μm in stainless. Set surface speed by material, then verify by chip shape and sound.
- 4Warm the spindle and probeRun the spindle for 10–15 minutes, then probe the stock. Record the offset so thermal growth is visible in the data.
- 5Rough, then probe againLeave 0.05–0.1 mm on micro surfaces. Probe before finishing so drift is corrected, not assumed.
- 6Finish with light passesKeep radial engagement low. A 0.02 mm finishing pass on a micro wall removes marks without pushing the tool.
- 7Inspect and recordMeasure with a vision system or CMM with a small stylus. Report actual values, not just pass or fail.
Micro feature limits by geometry and material
Typical values from production micro work, not guaranteed limits for every geometry.
| Feature or material | Practical micro limit | Better alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Micro slot in aluminium 6061 | Width 0.5 mm, depth 3× width | Widen slot or reduce depth ratio |
| Micro slot in 316L stainless | Width 0.8 mm, depth 2× width | Rough with larger tool, finish with micro |
| Micro hole, drilled | Ø0.3 mm, depth 3× diameter | Drill from both ends if accessible |
| Micro hole, milled | Ø0.4 mm, depth 1.5× diameter | Use smaller depth or EDM |
| Thin wall, aluminium | 0.3 mm wall, 2 mm tall | Add ribs or accept Ra 1.6–3.2 μm |
| Thin wall, titanium TC4 | 0.5 mm wall, 3 mm tall | Reduce wall height or support with wax |
| Internal corner | Radius 0.1 mm minimum | Add corner radius to drawing |
| Surface finish on micro floor | Ra 0.8–1.6 μm as machined | Polish to reach Ra 0.2–0.8 μm |
When micro milling is the right call, and when it is not
If the feature is a slot, pocket or wall above Ø0.4 mm in aluminium or brass, micro milling on a 5-axis center is the economical route and holds ±0.005 mm. If the feature is a Ø0.2 mm hole, a sharp internal corner, or a mirror finish inside a deep cavity, plan for EDM, drilling or a secondary polish instead of forcing it through a micro end mill.
Questions engineers ask about micro work
What is the smallest feature you can machine?
As a working rule, micro slots from 0.5 mm wide in aluminium and 0.8 mm in stainless, and milled holes from Ø0.4 mm. Drilled holes go down to about Ø0.3 mm. The real limit depends on depth ratio, wall thickness and how the feature is measured.
Send the drawing with tolerances and we will tell you which features are millable and which are not.
Can you hold ±0.005 mm on a micro feature?
Our machines hold ±0.005 mm on position and size for suitable geometry. That is a capability figure, not a blanket promise. Thin walls, deep slots and titanium parts are harder, and the achievable tolerance on those features is set by deflection and heat.
We state the achievable tolerance per feature after DFM review, before quoting.
Does micro machining cost more than standard CNC work?
Usually yes, per part, because cycle times are longer and micro tools wear faster. The offset is that micro milling can replace a separate EDM or grinding step on some features, which often brings total cost back down.
DFM feedback in the first review points out where a small design change removes the expensive step.
How do you measure micro features?
Vision measurement and a CMM with a small stylus cover most micro features. For surface finish on micro floors we use a portable roughness tester where the geometry allows. Reports are available on request.
For critical dimensions we record actual values, not just pass or fail, so you can see the spread across the batch.
What surface finish can micro milling reach?
As machined, Ra 1.6–3.2 μm is normal on micro surfaces. Careful finishing passes reach Ra 0.8–1.6 μm. Below that, we polish, which reaches Ra 0.2–0.8 μm but can round a sharp edge.
If the drawing calls for a sharp edge and a mirror finish at the same time, the two requirements conflict. Tell us which one matters more.
Do you sign an NDA for micro part work?
Yes. Uploads are handled as confidential, and an NDA is available on request. We also hold ISO 27001:2022 for information security, alongside ISO 9001:2015, IATF 16949:2016 and ISO 13485:2016.
Medical and aerospace micro parts follow the same inspection route: material check, in-process monitoring and final inspection before shipment.
Send a micro feature drawing and get a real answer
Quotation and free DFM analysis within 12 hours. No minimum order quantity, from one prototype to 10,000+ parts. Uploads are secure and confidential.
12-hour quote100% inspection±0.005 mmNo MOQ