How to Determine the Cutting Depth in High-Speed Machining of a Twin-Spindle Machining Center
This guide is for process engineers and shop programmers who set up twin-spindle high-speed machining. You will get a repeatable way to pick axial and radial depth of cut per spindle, plus the limits that keep both sides of the table in tolerance.

In this article
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
Key takeaways
What actually sets the cutting depth in high-speed machining
On a twin-spindle machine, both tools cut at the same time. That single fact changes how you choose depth of cut. A setting that is safe on one side can push the other side past its load limit, and the part will move. So we treat depth of cut as a balance problem first, a chip-load problem second.
High-speed machining means high spindle speed and a small chip. The tool does not remove a thick slice; it peels a thin one fast. Because the chip is thin, most of the heat leaves with the chip instead of soaking into the workpiece. That is the whole point. If your axial or radial depth is too large, the chip gets thick, heat stays in the part, and you lose the benefit.
Two numbers define the cut. Axial depth of cut (ap) is how deep the tool engages along its axis. Radial depth of cut (ae) is how wide the tool engages across the material. You set both before you press cycle start. Changing one later usually means changing the other.
- 1ap = axial depthMeasured along the tool axis. Drives bending force on the tool.
- 2ae = radial widthMeasured across the cut. Drives heat and tool wear.
- 3Chip load (fz)Millimeters per tooth. Ties ap and ae to feed rate.
Material and hardness decide the starting range
Aluminum is forgiving. On 6061-T6 or 7075 with a 12 mm carbide end mill, we often run ap at 1.0-1.5 × tool diameter and ae at 8-12% of diameter for roughing. Spindle speed runs high, feed per tooth stays around 0.08-0.15 mm. The cut sounds light because it is.
Stainless 304 and 17-4PH behave differently. They work-harden, so a light rub is worse than a real cut. Keep ae at 6-10% of diameter and ap at 0.5-0.8 × diameter. If you drop below that window, the tool rubs, the surface hardens, and the next pass cuts harder material.
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V and Inconel sit at the tight end. Radial engagement drops to 5-8% of diameter, ap to 0.3-0.6 × diameter, and spindle load is watched closely. On these alloys, high-speed machining only pays off when the radial width is small enough that heat leaves with the chip.
- 1Aluminumap 1.0-1.5 × D, ae 8-12% of D
- 2Stainless / 17-4PHap 0.5-0.8 × D, ae 6-10% of D
- 3Titanium / Inconelap 0.3-0.6 × D, ae 5-8% of D
Why the twin-spindle layout forces a shallower cut
A single-spindle machine has one cutting force to manage. A twin-spindle center has two, and they act on the same part or on two parts sharing one fixture. If one side takes a heavier cut, the fixture sees a twisting load. Thin walls move, bores go oval, and the ±0.005 mm tolerance is gone before the finish pass.
The rule we use is simple: keep the load difference between the two spindles under 10%. In practice that means the two programs should use the same tool diameter, the same ae, and an ap difference no larger than 0.1-0.2 mm on roughing. If one side must take more, split the difference into two passes instead of one heavy pass.
Balance also matters for tool life. When one spindle works harder, its insert wears faster. After a few hundred parts, the two sides no longer match, and the operator has to stop and index one tool only. Matching the cut keeps both tools on the same wear curve.
- 1Load splitKeep the two spindles within 10% of each other.
- 2ap differenceNo more than 0.1-0.2 mm between sides on roughing.
- 3Fixture checkVerify clamping force before raising ap on either side.
Tool geometry, coating and overhang change the limit
A 12 mm end mill with 30 mm of overhang can take a much deeper axial cut than the same tool with 90 mm of overhang. Deflection grows with the cube of overhang length. When we need long reach, we cut ap by roughly half and raise the spindle speed to keep the chip load in range.
Coating matters too. AlTiN and AlCrN coatings tolerate higher temperatures, which supports the thin-chip, high-speed approach on steel and stainless. Uncoated carbide on aluminum is often better because it avoids built-up edge. The coating does not change the geometry of the cut, but it changes how much heat the edge can survive.
Helix angle and core diameter set how much the tool can take radially. A 45° helix with a thick core handles ae up to 10% of diameter well. A long, thin tool with a 30° helix will chatter at the same ae. If chatter starts, reduce ae first, not spindle speed.
- 1Overhang under 4 × DKeep full ap range.
- 2Overhang 4-6 × DCut ap by about half.
- 3Chatter appearsReduce ae first, then adjust feed.
Symptoms that tell you the depth of cut is wrong
Chatter on one spindle only usually means tool overhang or holder runout on that side, not a material problem. Check runout first. If runout is fine, reduce ae by 20% and test again. Raising spindle speed to chase chatter usually makes it worse on long tools.
Short tool life on one side points to uneven ap between spindles. Log the load on each side for a full shift. If one side runs 15% higher, split the heavier pass. This is common on parts with a boss on one end and a flat on the other.
Poor surface finish on the finish pass is often an ae problem. When ae drops under 0.1 mm, the tool rubs instead of cutting, and the Ra rises. Keep finishing ae between 0.1 and 0.3 mm so the edge bites.
- 1Chatter, one sideCheck runout, then cut ae by 20%.
- 2Fast wear, one sideBalance ap between spindles; split the heavy pass.
- 3High Ra on finishRaise ae to 0.1-0.3 mm so the edge cuts.
Step by step: setting depth of cut for both spindles
- 11. Check the setup before any numbersConfirm tool overhang, holder runout under 0.01 mm, and fixture clamping. Note material grade and hardness from the cert. If hardness is above the nominal range, plan for a shallower ap from the start.
- 22. Pick radial engagement firstSet ae as a percentage of cutter diameter: 8-12% for aluminum, 6-10% for stainless, 5-8% for titanium and Inconel. This number controls heat. Do not raise it to save passes unless the tool and holder can take the load.
- 33. Set axial depth from the tool and overhangStart at 1.0 × D for aluminum with short overhang, 0.5-0.8 × D for stainless, 0.3-0.6 × D for titanium. Halve the value if overhang exceeds 4 × D. Keep both spindles on the same ap within 0.1-0.2 mm.
- 44. Calculate feed from chip loadFeed rate = spindle speed × number of teeth × chip load. Target 0.08-0.15 mm per tooth for aluminum, 0.04-0.08 mm for stainless, 0.03-0.06 mm for titanium. Stay inside the tool maker's range.
- 55. Run a load test on one sideCut a scrap or first-off part with one spindle only. Watch spindle load. Target 60-75% of rated load. Above 80%, reduce ap or ae before running both spindles together.
- 66. Run both spindles and compare loadRun the twin cycle and log load on both sides. If the difference exceeds 10%, adjust ap or split the heavier pass in two. Re-check the first part for size and wall straightness.
- 77. Verify the finish pass separatelyFinishing uses a different setting: ae under 0.3 mm, ap under 0.5 mm, and higher spindle speed. This pass sets the Ra 0.8-1.6 μm window. Do not use roughing numbers here.
Starting depth-of-cut ranges by material and operation
Values assume a coated carbide end mill with overhang under 4 × D. Adjust down for long reach.
| Material | Operation | Axial ap | Radial ae |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminum 6061-T6 | Rough | 1.0-1.5 × D | 8-12% of D |
| Aluminum 7075 | Rough | 0.8-1.2 × D | 7-10% of D |
| Stainless 304 | Rough | 0.5-0.8 × D | 6-10% of D |
| 17-4PH | Rough | 0.4-0.7 × D | 5-8% of D |
| Ti-6Al-4V | Rough | 0.3-0.6 × D | 5-8% of D |
| Inconel | Rough | 0.3-0.5 × D | 4-7% of D |
| All steels | Finish | Under 0.5 mm | Under 0.3 mm |
The practical rule
Set radial engagement first, derive axial depth from tool stiffness, then balance the two spindles within 10% load. If size or finish drifts, cut ae before you cut speed.
Frequently asked questions
Can I run the same depth of cut on both spindles if the parts are different?
Only if the two parts have similar stiffness and similar features at the same point in the cycle. When one part has a thin wall and the other is solid, the same ap produces different deflection.
Split the cycle so the heavy cut happens on the stiff part first, then bring the second spindle in on a lighter pass. Keep the load difference under 10%.
Does high-speed machining always mean a shallow axial cut?
No. High-speed machining is defined by surface speed and chip load, not by ap alone. On aluminum with a short, stiff tool you can take ap at 1.0-1.5 × D and still be in the high-speed range.
The shallow axial rule applies mainly to hard alloys, long-reach tools and thin-wall parts.
How do I know the radial engagement is too high?
Spindle load climbs past 80% of rated load, chips come off blue or dark, and the tool wears on the corner rather than the flank. Any of those three means ae is too high.
Cut ae by 20% and re-test. If the load drops but chatter stays, the problem is tool overhang.
What runout should I hold before raising the depth of cut?
Hold tool runout under 0.01 mm at the cutting edge. Above that, one flute does most of the work, and the load reading will not match the other spindle.
Check runout with the tool in the holder, not on the bench. Holder condition matters as much as the tool.
Does coolant change the depth-of-cut limit?
Yes, but mostly through heat removal. High-pressure through-tool coolant lets you keep a slightly higher ae on stainless and titanium because chips clear faster.
On aluminum, air blast or minimum-quantity lubrication often works better than flood coolant, which can cause thermal shock on the edge.
Send us your twin-spindle part
Upload a STEP file and we will return a quotation with free DFM analysis within 12 hours.
12-hour quote100% inspectionNo minimum order