What Is Milligram Mirror Treatment?
Milligram mirror treatment is a mechanical surface process that brings a metal surface down to a near-mirror finish by removing tiny amounts of material in controlled passes. This page explains the mechanism, the metals and part shapes that suit it, and the cases where it is the wrong choice.

In this article
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
What Milligram Mirror Treatment Actually Removes
Every machined surface carries tool marks. A face mill leaves overlapping arcs, an end mill leaves parallel scallops, and a turning insert leaves a fine helix. Those marks are the surface. Milligram mirror treatment is the last stage that flattens them.
The name comes from the scale of removal. Instead of cutting a pass of 0.2 mm, the process takes away material measured in milligrams per square centimeter, or a few micrometres of depth. A typical mirror sequence removes 2–10 μm in total across all finishing steps.
That small depth matters. A part already milled to ±0.005 mm will not lose its tolerance when only a few micrometres come off. A part left 0.05 mm oversize for hand polishing will. This is the main reason the process is planned at the CAM stage, not after the part is made.
Removal happens in stages, and each stage has a job. Coarse abrasive cuts the peaks left by the cutter. Medium abrasive removes the scratches the coarse step created. Fine abrasive removes the medium scratches. The final pass removes almost nothing and only refines the surface.
Skip a stage and the surface shows it. A scratch from 400 grit will still be visible after 1500 grit unless the intermediate steps did their work. Mirror finishing is a chain, and the weakest link sets the result.
- 1Depth per stageCoarse 3–5 μm, medium 1–3 μm, fine under 1 μm
- 2Total removalUsually 2–10 μm from first abrasive to final polish
- 3Why it holds toleranceRemoval stays far below the machining tolerance band
Which Metals Take a Mirror Finish
Aluminum finishes fast and takes a deep, bright mirror. Alloys in the 6061 and 7075 families respond well, though 7075 shows more grain structure when polished. Soft grades like 5052 tend to smear instead of cut, so they need lighter pressure and sharper abrasive.
Stainless steel is the classic mirror material. Grades 304, 316 and 316L all polish to a clean reflective surface. The 400-series martensitic grades such as 420 and 440C reach a higher gloss, but they are harder and take longer. Grade 303 polishes poorly because of its sulfur content, which leaves small pits.
Copper and brass are the easiest of all. C110 copper and C36000 brass cut quickly and hold a mirror with little effort. They also scratch just as quickly, so handling after finishing matters as much as the finishing itself.
Titanium and Inconel sit at the other end. Both are gummy and heat-sensitive. Titanium can reach a good finish with slow speeds and fresh abrasive, but Inconel usually stops at a satin look because the material work-hardens under the polishing pad.
Plastics are a separate story. Acrylic and polycarbonate can be polished to optical clarity, but they are not metals and behave differently under heat. PEEK and POM take a duller sheen rather than a true mirror.
- 1Fast and bright6061, 7075, C110, C36000
- 2Classic mirror304, 316, 316L stainless
- 3Hard and glossy420, 440C, 17-4PH
- 4Difficult303 stainless, Inconel, magnesium
Part Shapes That Suit Milligram Mirror Treatment
Flat faces are the simplest case. A mold plate, a manifold face or a sealing surface with no deep pockets can be finished on a lapping plate or a wide polishing wheel. The whole face reaches the same finish at the same time.
Curved surfaces need a different approach. A shaft, a roller or a spherical seat is usually finished on a lathe with abrasive tape or a rotating mop. The tool follows the profile, so the finish stays even as long as the feed is constant.
Internal features are where the process gets expensive. A bore of Ø10 mm or smaller, a deep slot, or a cavity with a 2 mm corner radius cannot be reached by a polishing wheel. These areas need abrasive flow, a mounted point, or a shaped felt bob, and each adds handling time.
Sharp edges are a risk. Polishing rounds them. If a drawing calls for a sharp edge on a mirror face, the edge must be masked or the part must be finished before the edge is cut. Otherwise the mirror finish and the sharp edge cannot both survive.
Blind holes and cross-drilled passages are the hardest of all. Abrasive cannot reach the bottom of a blind hole evenly, and a cross hole breaks the surface with a burr. In most cases we finish the accessible faces and leave the internal passages as machined.
- 1EasyOpen flat faces, outer diameters, shallow curves
- 2ModerateBores over Ø20 mm, wide slots, spherical seats
- 3HardBores under Ø10 mm, deep cavities, blind holes
- 4ConflictSharp edges and mirror faces on the same part
How a Mirror Finish Is Measured and Verified
Ra is the number most drawings use. It is the arithmetic average of surface deviations from the mean line, measured in micrometres. A mirror surface usually lands between Ra 0.2 and Ra 0.8 μm. Standard machining sits at Ra 1.6–3.2 μm.
Ra alone does not describe a mirror. Two surfaces can share the same Ra and look completely different. A surface with fine, evenly spaced scratches scatters light and looks hazy. A surface with the same average roughness but random, shallow texture can look bright and reflective.
That is why gloss is measured separately. A gloss meter reads reflected light at a fixed angle, usually 20°, 60° or 85°. For a mirror face, 60° readings above 90 gloss units are common on stainless and aluminum.
Inspection method matters too. A profilometer stylus with a 2 μm tip cannot resolve texture finer than its own radius, so it reports a flattering number. Optical profilometry or white-light interferometry gives a truer picture of a fine polish.
For production parts we agree the measurement method before the run starts. The same surface can pass or fail depending on whether the customer measures with a stylus, a gloss meter or a visual standard under a defined light source.
- 1RaArithmetic mean roughness, the usual drawing callout
- 2Gloss unitsReflected light at 20°, 60° or 85°
- 3Visual standardAgreed sample under fixed lighting
- 4Agree firstPick the method before the first part is finished
Where the Process Stops Being the Right Answer
If the part is a hidden bracket, a mirror finish buys nothing. It adds cost, adds handling risk and adds a surface that shows every fingerprint. Function should decide the finish, not the other way around.
If the finish is only there to hide a machining defect, polishing is the wrong fix. A chatter mark or a gouge will not disappear. It will spread. The right move is to correct the cut, then finish.
If the customer needs a mirror inside a Ø6 mm bore 40 mm deep, the cost climbs sharply and the result is uneven. In that case a different route, such as electropolishing or abrasive flow machining, usually gives a better result for the same money.
If the part is handled after finishing, the mirror will not last without protection. A clear anodize, a lacquer or a protective film keeps the surface intact through packing and assembly.
Finally, if the alloy is 303 stainless or a magnesium grade, we say so up front. A mirror finish on those materials is either impossible or unreliable, and a satin finish is the honest recommendation.
- 1Not worth itHidden, non-visible, purely functional faces
- 2Wrong fixPolishing over chatter marks or gouges
- 3Use another routeSmall deep bores, complex internal channels
- 4Plan protectionAnodize, lacquer or film for handled parts
Milligram Mirror Treatment vs Other Finishing Routes
Typical values, decided per part geometry and alloy.
| Route | Typical finish | Best for | Main limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milligram mirror treatment | Ra 0.2–0.8 μm | Flat faces, shafts, visible metal parts | Cannot reach small internal features |
| As-machined milling | Ra 1.6–3.2 μm | Functional faces, fits, bores | Visible tool marks remain |
| Bead blasting | Ra 1.5–3.0 μm, matte | Hiding marks, uniform look | No reflectivity at all |
| Electropolishing | Ra 0.2–0.5 μm | Stainless, complex shapes | Needs a bath, changes edge radius |
| Anodizing over polish | Ra 0.2–0.8 μm base | Colored decorative aluminum | Coating can dull the mirror |
| Electroless nickel | Follows base roughness | Wear faces, corrosion | Does not create gloss on its own |
The Practical Verdict
Choose milligram mirror treatment when the surface is visible, reachable and made of aluminum, stainless, copper or brass. Choose bead blasting or as-machined finishing when the face is hidden, and electropolishing when the mirror has to sit inside a complex stainless shape.
Milligram Mirror Treatment: Common Questions
Does milligram mirror treatment change part dimensions?
It removes 2–10 μm in total, measured in milligrams per square centimeter. That is far below a typical machining tolerance of ±0.005 mm, so a finished part stays in tolerance. The risk appears when a part is left deliberately oversize for polishing. In that case the removal depth must be written into the drawing so the machinist knows how much stock to leave.
Can the process be applied to a whole part at once?
Only if the whole surface is reachable. Outer faces, shafts and open curves can be finished in one setup. Internal bores, blind holes and deep cavities need separate handling, and the finish will be less even there. We usually finish the accessible faces and leave internal passages as machined.
How long does a mirror finish last?
An unprotected mirror on aluminum or copper will show handling marks within days of shipping if it is touched. Stainless holds up better. For parts that will be assembled or handled, we recommend a clear anodize, a thin lacquer or a peel-off protective film. The finish itself does not degrade on its own; it is the handling that damages it.
Is a mirror finish the same as a polished finish?
Not exactly. Polishing is the mechanical route to a mirror, but a mirror can also be reached by electropolishing, which is chemical. The look can be similar, the numbers can be similar, and the two are not interchangeable on every geometry. Electropolishing reaches internal shapes that mechanical polishing cannot, but it rounds sharp edges more.
What surface roughness should I put on the drawing?
Give a roughness callout and a measurement method. Ra 0.2–0.8 μm is the usual band for a mirror face, but Ra alone does not describe the look. Add a gloss target or an approved visual sample. Without that, a part can meet Ra and still not match what the customer expected to see.
Which materials should be avoided for a mirror finish?
303 stainless is the clearest example. Its sulfur content leaves small pits that survive polishing. Magnesium alloys also oxidize quickly and rarely hold a stable mirror. Inconel work-hardens under the pad and usually settles at a satin look. If the design needs a mirror on those materials, we flag the risk before quoting.
Send Us the Face You Need to Make Reflective
Upload the drawing with the finish callout and the measurement method. We review reachability, alloy and edge requirements, then quote with a defined finish spec.
Quote and DFM review within 12 hours100% inspection before shipmentNDA available on request